data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/070d2/070d2e2bd91a551f905e50940e6045cf0b26939d" alt=""
Yet I was doomed to disappointment. Firstly, as I probably could have worked out in advance from it being in the Junior Fiction section of the book awards rather than Young Adult fiction, this book is written for a younger audience than Year 9 or 10, featuring a primary-aged protagonist. Secondly, despite some nice touches in the narrative and dialogue, Leonie Agnew falls into the fatal trap of 'dumbing down' her writing for the younger audience. To Kill a Mockingbird and The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas have shown that it is not necessary to 'dumb-down' in order to tell a story through the eyes of a child protagonist who does not fully understand everything they are narrating. All we achieve by this 'age-appropriate' dumbing down is a nation of students with an incredibly narrow vocabulary, reading about things they already know.
However, my third and greatest disappointment with the novel was that it is not a fun story about kids getting political, rather the main plot revolves around Conrad coping with his dysfunctional family: an abusive step-father and his co-dependent mother. It is The God Boy updated by 20 years, cleaned up slightly and without a murder; just not as well-written.
However, before I discount the possibility of using the book totally, I would like to read some reviews from the target audience. Maybe young people today do want to read books about children living in apparently hopeless family situations. Personally, I just found it depressing.
No comments:
Post a Comment